|
Event Details
The Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences, part of the
Stanford Program in Law, Science & Technology presents
Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: Current Controversies
Overview:
Patent protection is crucial to the biotechnology industry. But too much protection, or the wrong sort of protection, can cause more problems than it solves. The Federal Circuit has been struggling with the application of patent law to biotechnology in recent years. Join an impressive collection of lawyers, judges, and scholars as they debate the cutting-edge issues in biotechnology patent law.
Panels:
Enablement and Written Description Requirements
The Federal Circuit has applied its disclosure rules with particular force in biotechnology, invalidating many patents and narrowly cabining the scope of protection given inventors. Recent developments have left the law in disarray. Our panel will discuss the direction of the law and what it means for biotechnology companies.
Non-Obviousness and the Inherency Doctrine
The Federal Circuit has applied the inherency doctrine with renewed vigor in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology areas, while leaving open questions as to what the doctrine means and how it affects DNA patents. By contrast, it has proven willing to permit patents on some inventions that seem obvious to scientists in the field. Our panel will seek to understand the rules in these fields.
Licensing
Patent licensing in biotechnology presents unique challenges, ranging from regulatory restrictions to reach-through licenses to antitrust concerns. We will discuss the nature and problems that come up in writing biotechnology patent licenses.
Keynote Speaker - John H. Barton
Trying Biotech Patent Cases
Join a panel of judges, litigators, and in-house counsel as they discuss the challenges and hazards of trying a biotechnology patent case to a jury.
Gene Patents and Policy
Though gene patents have been around for decades, their acquisition and enforcement continue to be the subject of much controversy, both here and abroad. Should DNA sequences alone be patentable? Do DNA patents risk creating an "anticommons"? What rights should the owner of a DNA patent have to control downstream research? Is compulsory licensing of gene patents ever appropriate? We will discuss these issues and others.
Future Issues
The conference will conclude with a general discussion by panelists and audience members of these issues and others that are likely to arise in the future.
|